I'm mainly testing out the ability to send a post from my email account to my blog. Then, after that, sometime I would like to test out the ability to send texts from my phone. I don't know what exactly this would be good for, but it certainly sounds like a neat idea! Imagine, I'm at the bar and I see a funny joke on the bathroom wall, well no more forgetting the joke, I'll just send my nifty blog a text with the joke in it. For me and all to see! haha. We'll see if I ever end up using that. The ability to upload from my email is a good feature though. Since I'm limited to certain websites here at work I'm unable to post any other way.
So, let me see, what are the pressing issues of the day? I've noticed recently when news stories leave out, what seems to me, the vital information about the story. Case in point: I read a story today on www.cincinnati.com that talked about Bush's State of the Union address tonight and different areas he would be focusing on. But Nowhere in the story was there any information about what time the address would be. Did the author ever consider that we might want to see the address? Or were we supposed to know that the address is always on at 9:00... I don't remember when it is but people regularly check cincinnati.com, they might not have even known that the President would be speaking tonight, and after being interested in what he's going to speak about, the next logical question is, "what time?"
Also, I was reading another story talking about how Alito was confirmed this morning. This story was on www.msn.com. It talked about how it was a very partisan vote and even compared it to a Clarence Thomas vote. So, the next logical question is... what was the tally of the vote? was it 51-49? who knows? because it was no where in the story. Eventually, I did find a link to the side which gave a state by state tally of the votes, 58-42. Partisan but not straight down the party lines.
So, let me see, what are the pressing issues of the day? I've noticed recently when news stories leave out, what seems to me, the vital information about the story. Case in point: I read a story today on www.cincinnati.com that talked about Bush's State of the Union address tonight and different areas he would be focusing on. But Nowhere in the story was there any information about what time the address would be. Did the author ever consider that we might want to see the address? Or were we supposed to know that the address is always on at 9:00... I don't remember when it is but people regularly check cincinnati.com, they might not have even known that the President would be speaking tonight, and after being interested in what he's going to speak about, the next logical question is, "what time?"
Also, I was reading another story talking about how Alito was confirmed this morning. This story was on www.msn.com. It talked about how it was a very partisan vote and even compared it to a Clarence Thomas vote. So, the next logical question is... what was the tally of the vote? was it 51-49? who knows? because it was no where in the story. Eventually, I did find a link to the side which gave a state by state tally of the votes, 58-42. Partisan but not straight down the party lines.
No comments:
Post a Comment